Hi Jan,

> On 21 Apr 2022, at 15:26, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> 
> There's no good reason to use these when we already have a pci_sbdf_t
> type object available. This extends to the use of PCI_BUS() in
> pci_ecam_map_bus() as well.
> 
> No change to generated code (with gcc11 at least, and I have to admit
> that I didn't expect compilers to necessarily be able to spot the
> optimization potential on the original code).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com>

Sorry I missed it.

Cheers
Bertrand


> ---
> Note that the Arm changes are "blind": I haven't been able to spot a way
> to at least compile test the changes there; the code looks to be
> entirely dead.
> ---
> v2: Arm build fix (for those who actually have ways to build the Arm
>    code being changed here).
> 
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/pci/ecam.c
> @@ -28,8 +28,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pc
>         container_of(bridge->ops, const struct pci_ecam_ops, pci_ops);
>     unsigned int devfn_shift = ops->bus_shift - 8;
>     void __iomem *base;
> -
> -    unsigned int busn = PCI_BUS(sbdf.bdf);
> +    unsigned int busn = sbdf.bus;
> 
>     if ( busn < cfg->busn_start || busn > cfg->busn_end )
>         return NULL;
> @@ -37,7 +36,7 @@ void __iomem *pci_ecam_map_bus(struct pc
>     busn -= cfg->busn_start;
>     base = cfg->win + (busn << ops->bus_shift);
> 
> -    return base + (PCI_DEVFN2(sbdf.bdf) << devfn_shift) + where;
> +    return base + (sbdf.devfn << devfn_shift) + where;
> }
> 
> bool __init pci_ecam_need_p2m_hwdom_mapping(struct domain *d,
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@ static int msix_capability_init(struct p
>             pbus = dev->info.physfn.bus;
>             pslot = PCI_SLOT(dev->info.physfn.devfn);
>             pfunc = PCI_FUNC(dev->info.physfn.devfn);
> -            vf = PCI_BDF2(dev->bus, dev->devfn);
> +            vf = dev->sbdf.bdf;
>         }
> 
>         table_paddr = read_pci_mem_bar(seg, pbus, pslot, pfunc, bir, vf);
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ int qinval_device_iotlb_sync(struct vtd_
>     qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.lo.res_1 = 0;
>     qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.lo.max_invs_pend = 
> pdev->ats.queue_depth;
>     qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.lo.res_2 = 0;
> -    qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.lo.sid = PCI_BDF2(pdev->bus, 
> pdev->devfn);
> +    qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.lo.sid = pdev->sbdf.bdf;
>     qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.lo.res_3 = 0;
> 
>     qinval_entry->q.dev_iotlb_inv_dsc.hi.size = size;
> 

Reply via email to