On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Paul Semel wrote:
> this function acts as the POSIX gettimeofday function
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Semel <phen...@amazon.de>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v4:
>     - new patch version
> 
>  common/time.c      | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/xtf/time.h |  8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/time.c b/common/time.c
> index c1b7cd1..8489f3b 100644
> --- a/common/time.c
> +++ b/common/time.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  #include <xtf/types.h>
>  #include <xtf/traps.h>
>  #include <xtf/time.h>
> +#include <xen/errno.h>

Sorting.

>  
>  #include <arch/barrier.h>
>  #include <arch/lib.h>
> @@ -109,6 +110,35 @@ uint64_t current_time(void)
>      return sec + boot_time;
>  }
>  
> +/* The POSIX gettimeofday syscall normally takes a second argument, which is
> + * the timezone (struct timezone). However, it sould be NULL because linux
> + * doesn't use it anymore. So we need for us to add it in this function
> + */
> +int gettimeofday(struct timeval *tp, void *restrict tzp)
> +{
> +    uint64_t boot_time, sec;
> +    uint32_t mod, nsec;
> +
> +    if ( tzp != NULL )
> +        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +    if ( tp == NULL )
> +        return -EINVAL;
> +
> +    get_time_info(&boot_time, &sec, &nsec);

Why are you using get_time_info here? Shouldn't you use the
current_time function introduced in the previous patch?

Or else I don't see the need to introduce current_time in the previous
patch.

> +#if defined(__i386__)
> +    mod = divmod64(&boot_time, SEC_TO_NSEC(1));
> +#else
> +    mod = boot_time % SEC_TO_NSEC(1);
> +    boot_time /= SEC_TO_NSEC(1);
> +#endif

Please use divmod64 unconditionally.

> +
> +    tp->sec = sec + boot_time;
> +    tp->nsec = nsec + mod;
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Local variables:
>   * mode: C
> diff --git a/include/xtf/time.h b/include/xtf/time.h
> index e33dc8a..ce4d6db 100644
> --- a/include/xtf/time.h
> +++ b/include/xtf/time.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@
>  
>  #include <xtf/types.h>
>  
> +struct timeval {
> +    uint64_t sec;
> +    uint64_t nsec;
> +};
> +
> +

Extra newline.

Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to