(Cc-ing maintainers / reviewers) On 28.06.2022 18:09, Charles Arnold wrote: > From 359f490021e69220313ca8bd2981bad4fcfea0db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Charles Arnold <carn...@suse.com> > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:55:28 -0600 > Subject: Fix compilation error with gcc13. > > xc_psr.c:161:5: error: conflicting types for 'xc_psr_cmt_get_data' > due to enum/integer mismatch; > > Signed-off-by: Charles Arnold <carn...@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> The subject would benefit from having a "libxc: " prefix, to know at the first glance which component is being touched. > --- a/tools/include/xenctrl.h > +++ b/tools/include/xenctrl.h > @@ -2520,7 +2520,7 @@ int xc_psr_cmt_get_l3_event_mask(xc_interface > *xch, uint32_t *event_mask); > int xc_psr_cmt_get_l3_cache_size(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t cpu, > uint32_t *l3_cache_size); > int xc_psr_cmt_get_data(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t rmid, uint32_t cpu, > - uint32_t psr_cmt_type, uint64_t *monitor_data, > + xc_psr_cmt_type type, uint64_t *monitor_data, > uint64_t *tsc); > int xc_psr_cmt_enabled(xc_interface *xch); > The patch looks slightly garbled, reminding me of how things looked for me before I adjusted TB configuration accordingly. I'd be fine hand-editing the patch while committing, if no other need arises for a v2 (and of course once a maintainer ack has been provided). Jan
