On 06.07.2022 09:31, Henry Wang wrote: > It seems that this series has been stale for nearly a month, with nothing > heard > from maintainers. So I am sending this email as a gentle reminder for > maintainers.
A month? That's only since v2 submission. See ... >> -----Original Message----- >> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration >> >> ... of the huge monolithic source file. The series is largely code >> movement and hence has the intention of not incurring any functional >> change. >> >> It has now been almost a year since the v1 submission, without having >> had any feedback. ... here. Jan >> Some re-basing was necessary in the meantime, and a >> new patch (the last one) has been added - even if seemingly unrelated, >> it was in this context where I did think of that possible adjustment >> (which may want to be viewed somewhat RFC, as I know there are >> reservations against the use of -Os). >> >> 1: split off opcode 0f01 handling >> 2: split off opcode 0fae handling >> 3: split off opcode 0fc7 handling >> 4: split off FPU opcode handling >> 5: split off insn decoding >> 6: move x86_emul_blk() to separate source file >> 7: move various utility functions to separate source files >> 8: build with -Os >> >> Jan >
