On 10.11.2022 23:47, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 04/11/2022 16:18, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian/viridian.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/viridian/viridian.c >> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void cpuid_viridian_leaves(const struct vcpu *v, >> uint32_t leaf, >> res->a = CPUID4A_RELAX_TIMER_INT; >> if ( viridian_feature_mask(d) & HVMPV_hcall_remote_tlb_flush ) >> res->a |= CPUID4A_HCALL_REMOTE_TLB_FLUSH; >> - if ( !cpu_has_vmx_apic_reg_virt ) >> + if ( !has_assisted_xapic(d) ) >> res->a |= CPUID4A_MSR_BASED_APIC; > > This check is broken before and after. It needs to be keyed on > virtualised interrupt delivery, not register acceleration.
To me this connection you suggest looks entirely unobvious, so would you mind expanding as to why you're thinking so? The hint to the guest here is related to how it would best access certain registers (aiui), which to me looks orthogonal to how interrupt delivery works. Jan
