Hi Andrei, When submitting patches, please use the add_maintainer.pl script so that maintainers of the code modified are added in CC.
> On 7 Mar 2023, at 11:09, Andrei Cherechesu (OSS) > <andrei.cherech...@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > > From: Andrei Cherechesu <andrei.cherech...@nxp.com> > > This 2-patch series fixes the parsing of the ARM Generic Timer > interrupts from the device tree. > > If the generic timer interrupts order in the DT was different than > the expected order in Xen code, these interrupts would no longer be > correctly parsed and registered by Xen, and would result in boot failure. > > This method with using "interrupt-names" for the generic timer interrupts > instead of having them hardcoded in the DTB in a specific order is the newer > approach already implemented in Linux. Xen did not have the necessary code for > this approach, and it has been implemented by the means of this patch series. Would mind giving a link to an example or the Linux documentation if there is one ? Cheers Bertrand > > Functionality should remain the same if "interrupt-names" is not present in > the > Generic Timer DTB node of the platform, but the interrupts should then still > be > present in the expected "sec-phys", "phys", "virt", "hyp-phys", "hyp-virt" > order. > If "interrupt-names" is present, now it is also correctly handled. > > Andrei Cherechesu (2): > arch/arm: irq: Add platform_get_irq_byname() implementation > arch/arm: time: Add support for parsing interrupts by names > > xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 2 ++ > xen/arch/arm/include/asm/time.h | 3 ++- > xen/arch/arm/irq.c | 14 +++++++++++ > xen/arch/arm/time.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--- > xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c | 35 +++++---------------------- > 5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.35.1 > >
