On 16/03/2023 7:53 am, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 06.03.2023 21:40, Jason Andryuk wrote: >> hvm_xs_strings.h specifies xenstore entries which can be used to set or >> override smbios strings. hvmloader has support for reading them, but >> xl/libxl support is not wired up. This patches adds a new xl.cfg option >> and libxl support to write the xenstore strings. >> >> The xl syntax looks like: >> smbios=["bios_vendor=Xen Project","system_version=1.0"] >> >> The Go binding generation needed extending to support Arrays inside a >> KeyedUnion, which is what the first patch does. The generated go code >> builds, but it is otherwise untested. >> >> There are also oem strings, oem-1..oem-99, that HVM loader supports. >> xl parse multiple oem strings like smbios=["oem=A,oem=B"], libxl then >> iterates over them and assigned to the oem-%d entries. Both xl and >> libxl check that the 99 string limit isn't exceeded. >> >> The rendered man page and html don't have a newline at the end of the >> new section after patch 2. >> """ >> battery_device_name=STRING >> ms_vm_genid="OPTION" >> """ >> >> however the txt format is correct: >> """ >> battery_device_name=STRING >> >> ms_vm_genid="OPTION" >> """ >> >> It goes away after patch 3 is applied since it adds text about the "oem" >> option in between the two lines above. I'm at a loss as to why this is >> happening. >> >> v4 is a rebase and resend of v3. >> >> Jason Andryuk (3): >> golang/xenlight: Extend KeyedUnion to support Arrays >> xl/libxl: Add ability to specify SMBIOS strings >> xl/libxl: Add OEM string support to smbios >> >> docs/man/xl.cfg.5.pod.in | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ >> tools/golang/xenlight/gengotypes.py | 41 +++++++++------- >> tools/golang/xenlight/helpers.gen.go | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> tools/golang/xenlight/types.gen.go | 28 +++++++++++ >> tools/include/libxl.h | 5 ++ >> tools/libs/light/libxl_dom.c | 33 +++++++++++++ >> tools/libs/light/libxl_types.idl | 27 +++++++++++ >> tools/xl/xl_parse.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 8 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > Is this work something that's worth mentioning in CHANGELOG.md?
Yes. Thanks for remembering - I'd forgotten. ~Andrew
