On 21/06/23 12:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.06.2023 14:10, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
+ * - static function is used in an inline function with external linkage
+ - ARM64, X86_64
+ - Non-documented GCC extension. An inline function with external linkage
+ can be inlined everywhere. If that calls a static functions, which is
+ not available everywhere, it is a constraint violation according to
+ C99 6.7.4p3: "An inline definition of a function with external linkage
+ shall not contain a definition of a modifiable object with static
+ storage duration, and shall not contain a reference to an identifier
+ with internal linkage." A standard-compliant C compiler ought
+ to diagnose all constraint violations: when it does not, as is the
+ case for GCC, the behavior is implicitly undefined.
With _spin_lock_cb() taken care of, do we have any left? Or else can this
be dropped?
Dropped both from the document and the tool configuration.
Roberto
