On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Test for osstest, features used in
> Qubes OS"):
>> On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 12:04 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> > What if we 1) have two versions of the test -- "Fake suspend" and
>> > "Real Suspend"; 2) only run "Real suspend" on hardware specifically
>> > marked as having a suspend that works reliably; 3) default all
>> > hardware to 'false' until we do some testing to find out how reliable
>> > it is?
>> >
>> > That way we get suspend testing 95% effective as quickly as possible,
>> > and we can complete it as we have time.
>>
>> That sounds a very good plan to me, FWIW.
>
> OK, for starters, how about we add the fake suspend test to every
> flight.
>
> What is the rune for that.
>
> Do we want or need to do that test with a guest running ?
Unfortunately the patch was never checked in.
I'll send an updated patch.
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
