I was just going to apply this, but patch 1 seems to have a non-trivial conflict with the is_swiotlb_active removal in pci-dma.c. Can you resend against the current dma-mapping for-next tree?
- [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation of software IO T... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 1/9] swiotlb: bail out of swiotlb_init_la... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 2/9] swiotlb: make io_tlb_default_mem loc... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 3/9] swiotlb: add documentation and renam... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 4/9] swiotlb: separate memory pool data f... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 5/9] swiotlb: add a flag whether SWIOTLB ... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 8/9] swiotlb: allocate a new memory pool ... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 9/9] swiotlb: search the software IO TLB ... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 6/9] swiotlb: if swiotlb is full, fall ba... Petr Tesarik
- [PATCH v6 7/9] swiotlb: determine potential physica... Petr Tesarik
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation of soft... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation of ... Petr Tesařík
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Allow dynamic allocation... Petr Tesarik
