On 28.08.2023 12:14, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> The return value of bogus_8259A_irq() is wrong: the function will
> return `true` when the IRQ is real and `false` when it's a spurious
> IRQ. This causes the "No irq handler for vector ..." message in
> do_IRQ() to be printed for spurious i8259 interrupts which is not
> intended (and not helpful).
>
> Fix by inverting the return value of bogus_8259A_irq().
>
> Fixes: 132906348a14 ('x86/i8259: Handle bogus spurious interrupts more
> quietly')
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
