On 28.08.2023 15:19, Simone Ballarin wrote: > --- a/docs/misra/rules.rst > +++ b/docs/misra/rules.rst > @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change. > - Precautions shall be taken in order to prevent the contents of a > header file being included more than once > - Files that are intended to be included more than once do not need to > - conform to the directive > + conform to the directive. Files that explicitly avoid inclusion guards > + under specific circumstances do not need to conform the directive.
Nit: There's a "to" missing near the end of the added sentence. Can likely be taken care of while committing, since Stefano has already ack-ed this, but I'd like to still raise the question of the utility of this statement: How is one to know whether omission of guards is intentional? Jan
