On 25.10.2023 16:50, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > Ok, I'll send a revised version using MASK_LOWEST_BIT, taking into > account also the > other comments about the explanation on the macro definition > (which some IDEs even show when hovering on its usage, which could > partially address > the latter concern).
You're of course free to do so, but since - as indicated before - MASK_LOWEST_BIT() imo isn't a better name than LOWEST_BIT(), I'll continue to object. Jan
