On 31/10/2023 13:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 31/10/2023 1:31 pm, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,

On 31/10/2023 13:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

Henry already provided a similar patch [1]. The only reason it is not
yet committed is because we haven't yet set a final date for 4.18 and
I want to avoid any clash when that patch will appear.

Cheers,

[1] 20231023092123.1756426-5-henry.w...@arm.com

This section should not have been deleted in d9f07b06cfc9.

Why? This has always been our process. We should not ship 4.18 with the UNSTABLE section. So it was correct to delete it in d9f07b06cfc9.


It's fine to have an unstable section before the 4.18 date is confirmed,
and the section must exist before staging is re-opened for 4.19 content.

I disagree. 4.19 will not be fully re-open until we finally release. So I wouldn't expect any new features to be merged.


I don't mind which of these two patches gets committed, but one of them
is getting committed today ahead of staging re-opening.  Part of
branching ought to ensure that this section exists.

If you want to go down that route, then please update the docs/process/branching-checklist.txt. Otherwise, I will continue to do as I did previously.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

Reply via email to