On Thu, 2023-12-07 at 15:28 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.11.2023 11:30, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/nospec.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/* Copyright 2018 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights
> > Reserved. */
> > +
> > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_NOSPEC_H
> > +#define _ASM_RISCV_NOSPEC_H
> > +
> > +static inline bool evaluate_nospec(bool condition)
> > +{
> > + return condition;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void block_speculation(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_NOSPEC_H */
>
> This being identical between Arm, PPC, and now RISC-V, wouldn't this
> be another
> asm-generic/ candidate? (Whether such trivial stubs are copyrightable
> is, as
> per earlier remarks, at least questionable to me.)
It is a good candidate to be moved to asm-generic. Thanks for notice
that. I'll update move this patch to generic headers patch series.
I am not sure too but the copyright was presented in Arm's file and
RISC-V's version is just a copy so I decided to leave it.
Does any documented rule exist in which cases copyright should be and
not?
~ Oleksii
