On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 5:31 PM Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11.12.2025 13:06, Mykola Kvach wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 1:44 PM Mykola Kvach <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I tested the issue with the provided patch, and it is still reproducible.
> >
> > I also triggered a pipeline with the patch you provided on top of my
> > changes [1],
> > and it failed there as well. In fact, it exposed additional problems
> > in other jobs.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/mykola_kvach/xen/-/pipelines/2209153728
>
> These are the failures we're trying to hunt down.
>
> Looking at one of the Arm build logs, I can't see any indication that you
> actually
> extended the patch to Arm's linking rule. Hence my conclusion in the other
> reply
> may be wrong - we simply still don't know what the situation is there.
You're right, I missed the necessary changes. Would this diff be sufficient?
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
index 4a549a1ac0..8283f13aee 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Makefile
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ $(TARGET)-syms: $(objtree)/prelink.o $(obj)/xen.lds
| $(objtree)/tools/symbols $(all_symbols) --sysv --sort \
> $(dot-target).2.S
$(MAKE) $(build)=$(@D) $(dot-target).2.o
+ $(call compare-symbol-tables,$(dot-target).1.o,$(dot-target).2.o)
$(LD) $(XEN_LDFLAGS) -T $(obj)/xen.lds $< $(build_id_linker) \
$(dot-target).2.o -o $@
$(NM) -pa --format=sysv $@ \
>
> Jan
Best regards,
Mykola
