On 2026-01-14 08:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
... as far as we presently use them in the codebase.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
+ /* Leaf 0x6 - Therm/Perf. */
+ union {
+ uint32_t _6a;
+ struct {
+ bool :1,
+ hw_feedback:1;
+ };
+ union {
+ uint32_t _6c;
+ struct {
+ bool hw_feedback_cap:1;
Maybe with an comment of "/* aperf/mperf */" since that is probably how
it is better know? I was confused with hw_feedback above which is
different.
Actually, looking at patch 2, I'd prefer leaving this named aperfmperf.
While not the SDM name, I think it's a more common name for the feature.
Either way (but preferably with aperfmperf):
Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <[email protected]>
Regards,
Jason
