On 29.01.2026 17:04, Teddy Astie wrote: > Le 29/01/2026 à 15:06, Jan Beulich a écrit : >> On 29.01.2026 14:58, Teddy Astie wrote: >>> While we may not want all the other CPU informations. We likely >>> want to keep the CPU string as it's more practical than trying to >>> decode it from the family/model/stepping combination. >> >> Yet why would we want it logged several hundred times by default, on a >> big enough system? IOW ... > > Ah I see; one idea I had was to move this to early_cpu_init() or > somewhere similar, and only displaying it once (only for BSP ?) ?
Well, we have the command line option to log data for all CPUs to help in case of problems. Jan
