On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 03:12:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.08.18 at 10:51, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:49:44AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 30.08.18 at 06:42, <osstest-ad...@xenproject.org> wrote: > >> > flight 126907 xen-4.7-testing real [real] > >> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/126907/ > >> > > >> > Regressions :-( > >> > > >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > >> > including tests which could not be run: > >> > test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 22 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail > >> > REGR. vs. 125057 > >> > > >> > Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): > >> > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail in 126716 > >> > pass in 126907 > >> > test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 22 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail > >> > in 126716 pass in 126907 > >> > >> Interesting - the test has moved to the chardonnays now, and > >> hence it succeeded this time. > > > > That's because ... > > > > <liuw> Right, I have started a repro flight. Let's see how it goes. > > <liuw> It will probably have a side effect that the failed job will run > > on other hosts so it will pass. > > Oh, that's what you've meant. I suppose there's no way to prevent > eventual false pushes from happening?
From my understanding of osstest's scheduler that's not possible at the moment. Wei. > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
