On 31/08/18 00:14, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 08/30/2018 07:11 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 08/28/2018 01:39 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> By making {vmx,svm} in hvm_vcpu into an anonymous union (consistent with
>>> domain side of things), the hvm_{vmx,svm} defines can be dropped, and all 
>>> code
>>> refer to the correctly-named fields.  This means that the data hierachy is 
>>> no
>>> longer obscured from grep/cscope/tags/etc.
>>>
>>> Reformat one comment and switch one bool_t to bool while making changes.
>>>
>>> No functional change.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
>>>
>> Do we still support pre-4.6 gcc? 
> Or 4.4.6? I don't remember.

I'm aware of that bug and it is 4.6 iirc.

However, in this case there are no initialisers.  The memory starts off
as a zeroed heap page and has a plethora of init() functions call on it
to set things up.

>
> -boris
>
>
>> They have a bug that doesn't allow
>> initializers for anonymous structs/unions. I don't know whether we have
>> any for vmx/svm, but I thought I'd mention this just in case.
>>
>> Other than that, for SVM bits in patches 3,4,6 and 7
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>

Thanks.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to