Hi, On 10/3/18 12:00 AM, Paul Durrant wrote: > ...meaning 'device DMA frame number' i.e. a frame number mapped in the IOMMU > (rather than the MMU) and hence used for DMA address translation. > > This patch is a largely cosmetic change that substitutes the terms 'gfn' > and 'gaddr' for 'dfn' and 'daddr' in all the places where the frame number > or address relate to a device rather than the CPU. > > The parts that are not purely cosmetic are: > > - the introduction of a type-safe declaration of dfn_t and definition of > INVALID_DFN to make the substitution of gfn_x(INVALID_GFN) mechanical. > - the introduction of __dfn_to_daddr and __daddr_to_dfn (and type-safe > variants without the leading __) with some use of the former. > > Subsequent patches will convert code to make use of type-safe DFNs. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant<paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Acked-by: Jan Beulich<jbeul...@suse.com> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian<kevin.t...@intel.com> > Acked-by: Julien Grall<julien.gr...@arm.com> > --- > Cc: Wei Liu<wei.l...@citrix.com> > Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit<suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini<sstabell...@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com> Thanks, Suravee _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
