On 10/23/18 3:03 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
domain_build.c is too large.
Move all the ACPI specific device tree generating functions from
domain_build.c to acpi/domain_build.c.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefa...@xilinx.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- rename acpi_dt_build to domain_build.c
- add copyright header
- remove useless #include
- remove acpi_dt_build.h, add domain_build.h
---
xen/arch/arm/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/acpi/domain_build.c | 592 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 585 +-----------------------------------
xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h | 31 ++
4 files changed, 629 insertions(+), 580 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/arm/acpi/domain_build.c
create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-arm/domain_build.h
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/Makefile
index 23963f8..94ae249 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/Makefile
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
obj-y += lib.o
+obj-y += domain_build.o
obj-y += boot.init.o
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/acpi/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/domain_build.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44d3ad1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/domain_build.c
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@
+/*
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
I was about to ack the patch when I noticed the license is not correct
here. This is GPLv2+ license while Xen is GPLv2 only. I know that some
of Xen code contain such license, but this is not the case for
domain_build.c. As there as no copyright license, we should then assume
GPLv2.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel