> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] > Sent: 01 November 2018 13:59 > To: rcojoc...@bitdefender.com > Cc: brian.wo...@amd.com; suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com; > aisa...@bitdefender.com; Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Paul > Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; > jun.nakaj...@intel.com; Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com>; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org; boris.ostrov...@oracle.com; > ta...@tklengyel.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] x86/hvm: Clean up may_defer from hvm_* helpers > > >>> Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> 11/01/18 11:31 AM >>> > >On 10/30/18 8:19 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >>> From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:aisa...@bitdefender.com] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 5:19 PM > >>> > >>> The may_defer var was left with the older bool_t type. This patch > >>> changes the type to bool. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisa...@bitdefender.com> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.t...@intel.com> > > > >I think this trivial patch has all the acks it needs to go in? > > It being trivial, I was considering to ignore the need for Paul's ack in > this > case (which iirc has not been given so far), but since you ask - did you > check before asking? I can only re-iterate that generally it is the > submitter > to chase acks, not any of the potential committers. >
Apologies. I missed this. Consider it... Acked-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
