Enabling and disabling one of the two isn't tested in OSSTest yet.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
---
We need to sort this out for 4.12 release.
On the one hand, exposing them seems risky.
On the other hand, if there are bugs which cause xen to wander into a
path which hits BUG or ASSERT, they are problems with older releases
as well. And we definitely want to make each of the two security
supported in the long run.
---
xen/arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 5c2d1070b6..3e020dc629 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ source "arch/Kconfig"
config PV
def_bool y
- prompt "PV support"
+ prompt "PV support" if EXPERT = "y"
+ default y
---help---
Interfaces to support PV domains. These require guest kernel support
to run as a PV guest, but don't require any specific hardware support.
@@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ config PV_LINEAR_PT
config HVM
def_bool !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE
- prompt "HVM support"
+ prompt "HVM support" if EXPERT = "y"
---help---
Interfaces to support HVM domains. HVM domains require hardware
virtualisation extensions (e.g. Intel VT-x, AMD SVM), but can boot
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
