On 2/4/19 1:55 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:aisa...@bitdefender.com]
Sent: 04 February 2019 11:37
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com>; jbeul...@suse.com; Andrew
Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>; Roger
Pau Monne <roger....@citrix.com>; rcojoc...@bitdefender.com;
ta...@tklengyel.com; George Dunlap <george.dun...@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] x86/emulate: Move hvmemul_linear_to_phys
Ping, any thoughts on this are appreciated.
Regards,
Alex
On 11.01.2019 17:37, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
This is done so hvmemul_linear_to_phys() can be called from
hvmemul_map_linear_addr()
I have no objection to pure code movement for this purpose. I certainly prefer
it to forward declaration of statics.
Thanks for the reply!
We're also after thoughts on the whole series (replying to this specific
patch instead of the cover letter was an accident).
We expect the second patch to be more controversial and in some need of
detailed scrutiny.
Thanks,
Razvan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
