>>> On 04.02.19 at 20:08, <sstabell...@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote: >> And btw - I can't judge on b. anyway, as I still don't know what >> exactly MISRA compliance is to mean, with the rules to adhere to >> suitably justified. > > I can't pretend to know exactly what MISRAC compliance means for this > specific issue, but we do have the recommended way forward by the > compliance experts, which also matches the rough understanding of most > of the engineers involved in this discussion. Picking the option > suggested by the MISRAC people, could be a decent way to settle this > debate?
It could be, if their reasoning was acceptable, which to me in particular means (a) backed by references to the C spec and (b) not resorting to use compiler bugs as an excuse for (pseudo) rules. But I'm afraid by saying this I'm not really opening up any new avenues... Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
