Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH] console: avoid buffer overflow in
guest_console_write()"):
> On 29.11.2019 11:22, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > Is sizeof(array[0]) always 0, or is this just a GCC-ism ? Godbolt
> > suggests is 0 on all compiler we support.
> >
> > Either way, isn't the more common idiom + 0ul ? Personally, I feel that
> > is clearer to follow.
>
> I decided against + 0ul or alike because in principle size_t
> and unsigned long are different types. In particular 32-bit
> x86 gcc uses unsigned int for size_t, and hence min()'s
> type safety check would cause the build to fail there. The
> same risk obviously exists for any 32-bit arch (e.g. Arm32,
> but I haven't checked what type it actually uses).
I don't know what i wrong with
(size_t)0
which is shorter, even !
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
