On 13/12/2019 16:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.12.2019 16:49, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:05:11PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.12.2019 19:27, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/xen/.gitignore
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>>>> +*.lex.c
>>>> +*.tab.[ch]
>>> Why do these get moved here from ...
>>>
>>>> --- a/xen/tools/kconfig/.gitignore
>>>> +++ b/xen/tools/kconfig/.gitignore
>>>> @@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
>>>>  #
>>>>  # Generated files
>>>>  #
>>>> -config*
>>>> -*.lex.c
>>>> -*.tab.c
>>>> -*.tab.h
>>>> -zconf.hash.c
>>>>  *.moc
>>>> +*conf-cfg
>>> here?
>> Well, it's more like they move from linux.git/scripts/kconfig/.gitignore
>> to linux.git/.gitignore
> Which doesn't answer the why (for our repo).

srsly?

We shouldn't edit headers we don't actually resync because it may make
resyncing harder (allegedly), yet we shouldn't keep an in-sync directory
in sync when we do actually resync it?

I find your lack of consistency in review requests impossible to predict.

As far as I'm concerned, Anthony's patch is fine.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to