On 16.12.19 17:15, SeongJae Park wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:37:20 +0100 SeongJae Park <sjp...@amazon.com> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:45:25 +0100 SeongJae Park <sjp...@amazon.com> wrote:
From: SeongJae Park <sjp...@amazon.de>
[...]
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
@@ -824,6 +824,24 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
}
+/* Once a memory pressure is detected, squeeze free page pools for a while. */
+static unsigned int buffer_squeeze_duration_ms = 10;
+module_param_named(buffer_squeeze_duration_ms,
+ buffer_squeeze_duration_ms, int, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(buffer_squeeze_duration_ms,
+"Duration in ms to squeeze pages buffer when a memory pressure is detected");
+
+/*
+ * Callback received when the memory pressure is detected.
+ */
+static void reclaim_memory(struct xenbus_device *dev)
+{
+ struct backend_info *be = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev);
+
+ be->blkif->buffer_squeeze_end = jiffies +
+ msecs_to_jiffies(buffer_squeeze_duration_ms);
This callback might race with 'xen_blkbk_probe()'. The race could result in
__NULL dereferencing__, as 'xen_blkbk_probe()' sets '->blkif' after it links
'be' to the 'dev'. Please _don't merge_ this patch now!
I will do more test and share results. Meanwhile, if you have any opinion,
please let me know.
Not only '->blkif', but 'be' itself also coule be a NULL. As similar
concurrency issues could be in other drivers in their way, I suggest to change
the reclaim callback ('->reclaim_memory') to be called for each driver instead
of each device. Then, each driver could be able to deal with its concurrency
issues by itself.
Hmm, I don't like that. This would need to be changed back in case we
add per-guest quota.
Wouldn't a get_device() before calling the callback and a put_device()
afterwards avoid that problem?
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
