On 28.01.2020 16:55, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 22.01.2020 21:23, Wei Liu wrote: >>> This will be useful when invoking hypercall that targets specific >>> vcpu(s). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <li...@microsoft.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <p...@xen.org> >> >> For formal reasons >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> >> However I wonder whether the Viridian entry in MAINTAINERS shouldn't >> be extended by >> >> F: xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/ >> >> (and possibly have its title adjusted). Thoughts? > > This isn't about emulating Hyper-V inside Xen, so I don't think that's > the right approach here.
Well, it's the code producing the interface in one case, and consuming it here. So there is some overlap at least. > That said, if Paul wants to take this under his purview, it's fine by me > -- that would make me easier to upstream my patch. ;-) I also wouldn't > mind adding myself as maintainer for this path. Perhaps best both of you? Paul, Andrew, what do you think? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
