On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 11:02 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > +    /* Pages from the boot allocator need to pass through 
> > init_heap_pages() */
> > +    if ( unlikely(!pg->count_info) )
> 
> ... while I think this check may be fine here, no similar one
> can be used in free_domheap_pages(), yet pages getting handed
> there isn't less likely than ones getting handed to
> free_xenheap_pages() (if we already fear mismatch).

Do we care about that?

ICBW but I don't think I've seen a case where boot-allocated pages get
handed to free_domheap_pages() later. I've only seen them handed to
free_xenheap_pages(). These are pages which are mapped to Xen, not
domheap pages.

You are already expected *not* to conflate free_xenheap_pages() and
free_domheap_pages().

I think it should be OK to declare that freeing boot-allocated pages
with free_xenheap_pages() is permitted, but freeing them with
free_domheap_pages() isn't.

(Note my straw man patch didn't fix the CONFIG_SEPARATE_XENHEAP case
and doesn't trivially port to that version of free_xenheap_pages()
because the PGC_xen_heap flag isn't used there. But it's fixable
relatively easily.



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to