On 7 February 2020 16:30:04 GMT, "Xia, Hongyan" <hongy...@amazon.com> wrote: >On Fri, 2020-02-07 at 15:57 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >> From: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk> >> >> ... >> >> Finally, make free_xenheap_pages() and free_domheap_pages() call >> through to init_heap_pages() instead of directly to free_heap_pages() >> in the case where pages are being free which have never passed >> through >> init_heap_pages(). >> >> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <d...@amazon.co.uk> > >If both end up calling free_heap_pages, can we just put the check >there?
Ideally not because init_heap_pages() then calls free_heap_pages() and the "recursion" is best avoided. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
