On 10/02/2020 13:22, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.02.2020 16:19, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> --- a/docs/misc/pvh.pandoc >> +++ b/docs/misc/pvh.pandoc >> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ following machine state: >> * `cs`: must be a 32-bit read/execute code segment with a base of ‘0’ >> and a limit of ‘0xFFFFFFFF’. The selector value is unspecified. >> >> - * `ds`, `es`: must be a 32-bit read/write data segment with a base of >> + * `ds`, `es`, `ss`: must be a 32-bit read/write data segment with a base of >> ‘0’ and a limit of ‘0xFFFFFFFF’. The selector values are all unspecified. > Wouldn't this want accompanying with an adjustment to > xen/arch/x86/hvm/domain.c:check_segment(), which right now > isn't in line with either old or new version of this doc?
What do you thing is missing? It too is written with the expectation of %es being set up, which I checked before sending this patch. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
