On 25/02/2020 09:53, Paul Durrant wrote: > There's no particular reason shared_info need use a xenheap page.
? There are a number of ABI-critical reasons, not least the evtchn_pending field which Xen needs to write. I can see what you're trying to do, and it looks fine in principle, but the commit message isn't remotely accurate. Remember that you are in the process of changing the meaning/usage of the xenheap - preexiting uses conform to the old meaning, where the sole distinction between domheap and xenheap pages was whether Xen required a virtual mapping or not. The answer is "absolutely yes" for the shared info page. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
