On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 10:11 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
> ... evtchn_port_t here and elsewhere.

There are some interfaces with signed int as a type for port, e.g.
in include/xen/events.h.
Should I create additional patch to resolve inconsistency with evtchn
interface?
Or you suggest combining these changes into the existing patch?

Also as I understand 'evtchn' and 'port' are essentially the same entities
from perspective of local domain, related to each other roughly like
connection
and file descriptor pair. What do you think about renaming all 'evtchn'
arguments
and variables to 'port'? It will eliminate inconsistencies in the code,
for example
in include/xen/interface/event_channel.h and include/xen/events.h.

Yan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to