Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: Revert NR_CPUS=1 fix from 4.15 (was: Re: [PATCH]
fix for_each_cpu() again for NR_CPUS=1)"):
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:26:03AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Well, I didn't propose reverting (or taking this fix) because I think
> > build breakage is better than runtime breakage. But in the end, Ian,
> > it's up to you.
>
> Oh, right, sorry. The build issue only happens with NR_CPUS=1, in
> which case I agree, there's no need to do anything in 4.15 IMO.
Oh. Right. I had the impression that the build breakage broke other
configurations too.
Since you're saying that's not the case, please disregard my earlier
mail.
Ian.
