Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: Revert NR_CPUS=1 fix from 4.15 (was: Re: [PATCH] fix for_each_cpu() again for NR_CPUS=1)"): > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:26:03AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Well, I didn't propose reverting (or taking this fix) because I think > > build breakage is better than runtime breakage. But in the end, Ian, > > it's up to you. > > Oh, right, sorry. The build issue only happens with NR_CPUS=1, in > which case I agree, there's no need to do anything in 4.15 IMO.
Oh. Right. I had the impression that the build breakage broke other configurations too. Since you're saying that's not the case, please disregard my earlier mail. Ian.