On 14.04.2021 06:40, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > LBR, C-state MSRs should correspond to Ice Lake desktop according to > SDM rev. 74 for both models. > > Ice Lake-SP is known to expose IF_PSCHANGE_MC_NO in IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR > (as advisory tells and Whitley SDP confirms) which means the erratum is fixed > in hardware for that model and therefore it shouldn't be present in > has_if_pschange_mc list. Provisionally assume the same to be the case > for Ice Lake-D while advisory is not yet updated. > > Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhi...@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>