Okay, the version of OpenSolaris is: Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_101b November 2008 xVM is the 3.1 (whatever is stock with OSOL) I don't have anything unusual.
The hardware is as such: Dell 2900, 48G ram, Intel(r) Xeon(r) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz Dual 250G sata drives for the rpool, 8 450G sas drives for the datastore pool. It is really fast, does a great job with the exception of the crashing. And yes, I agree, I'd just run MySQL on Solaris if I could. It's the vendor that's the moron, not me ;) eClinicalWorks is so backwards they think that RHEL is a better platform for MySQL than OSOL, and they have it in their heads that x86 virtualization is somehow superior to zones. I fought this for about 6 months, but they are threatening to pull our contract, so I have to yield to the RHEL madness. Anyway, that's why I don't mind it crashing... it's their fault, eCW is filled with idiocy. It's a bit slower now on the RHEL ontop of xVM ontop of Solaris - 17% or so, but whatever. </rant> Okay, so if there is anything I can do to improve the product, I'd be glad to. Consider this a good test platform as this is real data (9 active clinics) with a real load. It's never working the cpu hard at all, just the drives get hit pretty good. eClinicalWorks uses full joins for about 80% of their db queries... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
