On 11 Sep 2009, at 8:44am, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
The output of syseventadm list is the same in both backend and
frontend (the one that gets the new block device) domU:

# syseventadm list
vendor=SUNW publisher=pcieb class=EC_dr subclass=ESC_dr_req
/usr/lib/pci/pcidr class=$class subclass=$subclass
publisher=$publisher dr_request_type=$dr_request_type
dr_ap_id=$dr_ap_id
vendor=SUNW publisher=pcieb_bcm class=EC_dr subclass=ESC_dr_req
/usr/lib/pci/pcidr class=$class subclass=$subclass
publisher=$publisher dr_request_type=$dr_request_type
dr_ap_id=$dr_ap_id
vendor=SUNW class=EC_dev_status subclass=ESC_dev_dle
/usr/lib/fs/zfs/zfsdle $phys_path

This isn't enough for the the guest to provide backend services - there should be something for EC_xpvdev or EC_xendev, depending on the age of your bits.

I'd guess that the packaging re-vamp means that the sysevent script isn't being added by the SMF service for a guest domain. johnlev - what did you decide about this?

_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to