Am 09.10.2009 22:54, schrieb Florian Manschwetus:
> Am 09.10.2009 22:40, schrieb Mark Johnson:
>>
>>
>> Florian Manschwetus wrote:
>>> Am 09.10.2009 19:33, schrieb Mark Johnson:
>>>>
>>>> Florian Manschwetus wrote:
>>>>> Today I upgraded to latest xvm-3.4 gate.
>>>>> I've found out yesterday that vlan usage is really easy (got a linux pv
>>>>> on host 1 with a indiana pv on host2 in one network, by just adding
>>>>> ,vlanid=2 to network definitions). Working like a charm. Today I tried
>>>>> to add a fresh installed win2008r2 x64 to this vlan, with the same
>>>>> procedure. But failed, no usable network, it was just like I have
>>>>> chosen
>>>>> wrong network. After removing the vlan stuff, all system are working
>>>>> now. Could someone explain what the problem is about?
>>>> Not a known problem... Did the Solaris and Linux guests continue to
>>>> work after you added the windows guest?
>>> Yes, perfectly, also adding another Linux where working.
>>>> Did you have this connected to a switch with vlan support? Did you
>>>> try any other HVM domains without PV drivers?
>>> What the hell??? Where do you all get properly working PV drivers for a
>>> x64 win2008(R2), as far as I know there are nothing that is at least a
>>> bit working, especially on xvm...
>>> PLEASE, if I'm wrong point on any working stuff.
>>
>> No we don't have PV drivers... I was wondering if you tried a different
>> kind of HVM guest without PV drivers, e.g. s10u5 or RHEL3, etc...
>> i.e. is it specific to windows or a HVM guest without PV drivers.
>>
> Ah, ok, no I didn't tried other HVM guests, but a knoppix or so should
> do the job.
> Just need to reestablish a VLAN.
> 
> Florian

Ok, could verify it also fails to work with a gentoo livecd (amd64)

I could ping the PV linux in the vlan from the dom0, but I can't ping
the hvm linux from dom0 nor pv linux.

Florian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> Did you try snooping the Window's VNIC to see if anything was moving
>>>> though it? I assume you only had one NIC assigned to the windows guest?
>>>>
>>> No, didn't tried to snoop.
>>> Yes just one NIC.
>>
>> ok, thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> MRJ
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xen-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to