Hi Alex, I looked into the code about reference of ACPI table. Single instance seems to be OK but I can't guarantee it. So I wrote ACPI tables walking code. The code isn't a big deal. How about this?
Attached patch is work around and not fully tested yet. (It works on Tiger and PRIMEQUEST) Thanks, Kouya Alex Williamson writes: > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:34 +0900, Kouya SHIMURA wrote: > > Hi Tristan, > > > > Thanks for comment. > > Sorry for my assumption. I revised a patch. > > Yeah, this is tedious... but becomes more small. :-) > > Hi Kouya, > > This is a good start. One problem, acpi_table_parse() is meant for > tables that can only have a single instance. There might be others, but > I know that at a minimum we need to handle multiple SSDTs. Can you look > to see what it would take to support that? We might need our own > function to manually walk all the tables. Thanks, > > Alex > > -- > Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org. >
assign_dom0_acpi_table.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
