Quoting "Dong, Eddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes, we met this too yesterday, current Xen/IA64 doesn't check supported > VA address bits # in architecture safe way, it just assume it is 61 > bits.
See http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2006-10/msg00227.html for a patch. This one was not fully ok and VA size is statically defined. > > main issue my patch addresses. The other issue is VHPT long format. > > Can u repost it? We need to make Xen/IA64 following SDM. > Yes, LVHPT is another major gap, good catch indeed! > This is worth to solving, and it should not be a very big effort if we > don't work guest page table. Luckily, today's Xen/IA64 is implementing > virtual TLB rather than shadow page table which makes it simple, right? Xen vti allows a LVHPT but do as if it doesn't exist. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
