In current patch series, we have many definition:
+#define ia64_itci ia64_native_itci
+#define ia64_itcd ia64_native_itcd
+#define ia64_itri ia64_native_itri
+#define ia64_itrd ia64_native_itrd
+#define ia64_tpa ia64_native_tpa
+#define ia64_set_ibr ia64_native_set_ibr
+#define ia64_set_pkr ia64_native_set_pkr
+#define ia64_set_pmc ia64_native_set_pmc
+#define ia64_set_pmd ia64_native_set_pmd
+#define ia64_set_rr ia64_native_set_rr
+#define ia64_get_cpuid ia64_native_get_cpuid
+#define ia64_get_ibr ia64_native_get_ibr
+#define ia64_get_pkr ia64_native_get_pkr
+#define ia64_get_pmc ia64_native_get_pmc
+#define ia64_get_pmd ia64_native_get_pmd
Which comes from gcc_intrin.h such as:
-#define ia64_itci(addr) asm volatile ("itc.i %0;;" :: "r"(addr)
: "memory")
+#define ia64_native_itci(addr) asm volatile ("itc.i %0;;" :: "r"(addr)
: "memory")
The question is we actually don't have xen_itci in the whole
patch, should
we remove the indirect reference of "new
ia64_itci-->ia64_native_itci->old_ia64_itci".
It is just identical and the change is redunadnt at least for
this moment.
Thanks, eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
