On Dec 5, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Jerone Young wrote:

This patch changes the code so can support more than one type delimiter on the command line. Now you can use "||" as well as "--". " || " works better with SLOF currently available. There is a bug in some cases using
SLOF where "--" is not treated as desired.

Patch has been tested and ready to go.

Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff -r 9148f7816d00 xen/arch/powerpc/boot_of.c
--- a/xen/arch/powerpc/boot_of.c        Tue Oct 24 19:11:00 2006 -0400
+++ b/xen/arch/powerpc/boot_of.c        Tue Dec 05 17:08:41 2006 -0600
@@ -964,10 +964,11 @@ static void * __init boot_of_module(ulon
     static module_t mods[4];
     ulong mod0_start;
     ulong mod0_size;
-    static const char sepr[] = " -- ";
+    static const char * sepr[] = {" -- ", " || "};
+    static int sepr_index = 0;

no reason for sepr_index to be static

     extern char dom0_start[] __attribute__ ((weak));
     extern char dom0_size[] __attribute__ ((weak));
-    const char *p;
+    const char *p = NULL;
     int mod;
     void *oft;

@@ -1020,11 +1021,18 @@ static void * __init boot_of_module(ulon

     of_printf("%s: dom0 mod @ 0x%016x[0x%x]\n", __func__,
               mods[mod].mod_start, mods[mod].mod_end);
-    p = strstr((char *)(ulong)mbi->cmdline, sepr);
+
+    //look for deliminator -- or || is delimator
We avoid C++ comments please use /* */ and I can't believe _I_ cought a typo :)

+    for(sepr_index; sepr_index < (sizeof(sepr)/sizeof(char *));
sepr_index++){
Please use "ARRAY_SIZE(sepr)"

+        p = strstr((char *)(ulong)mbi->cmdline, sepr[sepr_index]);
+        if (p != NULL)
+            break;
+    }
+
     if (p != NULL) {
         /* Xen proper should never know about the dom0 args.  */
         *(char *)p = '\0';
-        p += sizeof (sepr) - 1;
+        p += strlen(sepr[sepr_index]) - 1;

The -1 is because sizeof() includes '\0', so you can drop it here.




_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

Reply via email to