Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Niklaus Giger wrote:
Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 15:52 schrieb Jan Kiszka:
Niklaus Giger wrote: ...
If anybody has a working target with a Xenomai + BusyBox
combination and
would be willing to test drive my changes, I would appreciate a
feedback
enormously.
I hope this isnt waiting on my 'approval'.
I think its a great idea, and has been on my (way too stagnant) list
for
a while.
Your work has at least urged me to install busybox on my xeno-box. ;-)
My only concern is whether we've sufficiently distinguished the issues:
1 - ash vs bash
Its not entirely clear to me which flavors of sh busybox has:
ash / dash / not-bash
I gather u worked with ash, and it seems most valuable sh features
work there just fine ( shell-functions, even 'job-control' of a
fashion)
2 - busybox 'executables' only
I coded in a lot of 'full linux' gimme's, like zgrep, script, etc.
Niklaus has repaired many of these. I think a more thorough cleanup is
possible,
esp if things like 'script' are jettisoned for a simpler
shell-functions
or helper scripts.
This all implies a re-write, which is on my list...
(esp the job-control testing and repair)
Just stumbled over this again while cleaning up my mailbox. What's the
status? Waiting for improvements, or waiting for /someone/ to type svn
ci (and improve the topics above later)?
It's queued for now, waiting for a combined ack to merge the current
patch from JimC and Niklaus.
AFAIC, Niklaus is in the lead atm.
Im trying to get some GPIO stuff ready for -mm.
( I'll post separately on this ..)
I ran his changes once, I dont even remember what it did.
(which suggests that it didnt explode ;-)
IMO, take it when Niklaus says its ready.
I have some local changes here, but Ill work them into shape after
Niks changes go in (maybe much later :-(
We should probly confer on the longer-term issues too.
- a rational option-pass-thru, or a means to avoid doing so.
if we assume OPTS_${TOOLNAME} exists, we could
grab it out of env, and pass it into the benchmark prog.
- would require no prog mods, but gives us complete control
- would play nicer than assuming -T <secs> has meaning for all progs.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
