Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 09:51 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 19:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> plain text document attachment (enhance-kernel-fault-report.patch) >>>> Introduce xnarch_fault_um() to test if a fault happened in user-mode and >>>> applies the new feature to report core and driver crashes more verbosely. >>>> if (xnpod_shadow_p()) { >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_XENO_OPT_DEBUG >>>> - if (xnarch_fault_notify(fltinfo)) /* Don't report debug >>>> traps */ >>>> + if (!xnarch_fault_um(fltinfo)) { >>>> + xnarch_trace_panic_freeze(); >>> KGDB breakpoint issue? >> Sorry, please switch on verbose mode, didn't get yet what you mean. > > Oops, sorry. I meant: what if a KGDB breakpoint is hit from kernel space > while running a shadow thread? The way I read the modified test sequence > above, such bp trap is going to trigger a panic, instead of being > silently passed to Linux.
I would say: KGDB will not come along here with a breakpoint. It should already got involved in __ipipe_divert_exception(). Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core