Hi, I think moderators may comment on your question. I just take an opportunity to make a minor comment on the papers' content (a part of it).
I read briefly only the part of your thesis regarding the Xenomai and RTAI parts (page 4). Frankly speaking (and based on my humble opinion/knowledge of Xenomai), the information is badly presented, both historically- and technically-wise, at the very least. Starting from the very first sentence: "Xenomai: Forked from RTAI...". Have you ever (if not publicly then privately) asked somebody from the list to read/review your papers? I guess, no. But that would definitely have been a good idea. -- Best regards, Dmitry Adamushko _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
