Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Obviously a conversion error while switching to __xn_safe*. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> >>> Well, I have just checked the kernel code, and 0 as a return value of >>> strncpy_from_user is treated as a value in most places, even if not -EFAULT. >>> >> Better check our code: :) __xn_safe_strncpy_from_user works differently. > > Then I would tend to consider that xn_safe_strncpy is broken.
No, because it not a derivate of strncpy_from_user, but an internal service optimized for the most common use cases (where you don't care about the precise return value). Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
