On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 10:20 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 09:26:58AM +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: > > Ouch. I just can't believe this went unnoticed for that long... Well, no > > wonder why then, the critical IPI never gets registered, so never > > detected by the pipeline core in __ipipe_grab_irq. Thanks for the heads > > up. > > > > This may make things work a little better: > > Yes, works fine now. Thanks for your help.
Well, thank you for digging this issue, first. > > Richard > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c > > index 8968b24..a4fe229 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c > > @@ -164,16 +164,16 @@ int smp_request_message_ipi(int virq, int msg) > > if (msg < 0 || msg > PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK) { > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > -#if !defined(CONFIG_DEBUGGER) && !defined(CONFIG_KEXEC) > > - if (msg == PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK) { > > - return 1; > > - } > > -#endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_IPIPE > > if (msg == PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK) > > /* Piggyback the debugger IPI for the I-pipe. */ > > __ipipe_register_ipi(virq); > > #endif > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_DEBUGGER) && !defined(CONFIG_KEXEC) > > + if (msg == PPC_MSG_DEBUGGER_BREAK) { > > + return 1; > > + } > > +#endif > > > > err = request_irq(virq, smp_ipi_action[msg], IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU, > > smp_ipi_name[msg], 0); > > > > -- > > Philippe. > > > > -- Philippe. _______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core