Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Roland Stigge wrote: >>>> Hi Gilles, >>>> >>>> first - I'm sorry if you sometimes feel offended by my work on Xenomai >>>> in Debian. I understand that you are very much connected to your project >>>> and want to have it working perfectly everywhere. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, my time to work on this is limited and the last uploads >>>> were work in progress - to provide latest Xenomai in Debian. Further >>>> work on it was planned for this weekend. >>>> >>>> But please also understand that Debian developers will possibly >>>> prioritize work on upstream packages where they feel their work is >>>> appreciated. So please think about your tone before sending email and >>>> driving people away from Xenomai. >>> What matters for me is Xenomai users, not the Debian package maintainer. >>> I am almost thinking that I would prefer Xenomai not having an >>> "official" Debian package which has been shipping for monthes with buggy >>> adeos patches and lagging behind upstream development. >> Hey guys, this leads to nothing. >> >> I agree with Gilles that a distro package that could appear to users >> like it's as mature as upstream while it isn't does not help anyone. But >> not all the work here is paid, and resources will remain limited. So >> Roland's remark is valid as well that not everything can be done >> instantly in The Perfect Way. >> >> The only way to resolve this without killing the idea of ready-to-use >> Xenomai package is to openly discuss the problems of both sides and try >> to find optimal solutions. I also bet Roland would be happy about >> patch-based discussions - just like we are for upstream. Just let the >> discussion take place here on this list, in an objective manner, and >> ideally before things may show up in releases etc. > > As I already said, I think the proper place to discuss all this is on > the Xenomai mailing list. I have no problem renaming sigtest, at all, I > do not even require a patch to do it. The point is that we did not even > knew that it generated a conflict. And for me this is the real problem, > I am all for helping Roland generating good packages, but if he does not > want to talk to us, what choice do we have? >
We can only ask him kindly to remember xenomai-c...@gna.org. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
